Press "Enter" to skip to content

Could computers | Yoav Shoham | TEDxTelAviv


so I I never really had a passion for

so I I never really had a passion for computers this may sound funny coming

computers this may sound funny coming

computers this may sound funny coming from somebody was a computer science

from somebody was a computer science

from somebody was a computer science professor for almost thirty years but

professor for almost thirty years but

professor for almost thirty years but it’s true at some point in my life my

it’s true at some point in my life my

it’s true at some point in my life my parents decided that I should get a

parents decided that I should get a

parents decided that I should get a university education so I had them sign

university education so I had them sign

university education so I had them sign me up for computer science which I

me up for computer science which I

me up for computer science which I figured would be useful and honestly the

figured would be useful and honestly the

figured would be useful and honestly the first year I didn’t pay too much

first year I didn’t pay too much

first year I didn’t pay too much attention but then it grew on me and

attention but then it grew on me and

attention but then it grew on me and when at some point I discovered

when at some point I discovered

when at some point I discovered artificial intelligence or AI I got

artificial intelligence or AI I got

artificial intelligence or AI I got hooked I still am hooked and it’s not so

hooked I still am hooked and it’s not so

hooked I still am hooked and it’s not so much because of self-driving cars or

much because of self-driving cars or

much because of self-driving cars or personal digital assistants even though

personal digital assistants even though

personal digital assistants even though they’re terribly important I want to

they’re terribly important I want to

they’re terribly important I want to start by asking you six questions about

start by asking you six questions about

start by asking you six questions about what you think computers could do

what you think computers could do

what you think computers could do specifically I want you to tell me

specifically I want you to tell me

specifically I want you to tell me whether in your opinion computers could

whether in your opinion computers could

whether in your opinion computers could think understand be creative have

think understand be creative have

think understand be creative have feelings have free will and be conscious

feelings have free will and be conscious

feelings have free will and be conscious I’m not talking about today’s laptops or

I’m not talking about today’s laptops or

I’m not talking about today’s laptops or even the giant computer clusters of

even the giant computer clusters of

even the giant computer clusters of Google I’m speaking about computers in

Google I’m speaking about computers in

Google I’m speaking about computers in principle how they might be in 50 or 500

principle how they might be in 50 or 500

principle how they might be in 50 or 500 years imagine that you had to vote on

years imagine that you had to vote on

years imagine that you had to vote on these questions you had to answer yes or

these questions you had to answer yes or

these questions you had to answer yes or no you couldn’t abstain you couldn’t

no you couldn’t abstain you couldn’t

no you couldn’t abstain you couldn’t hedge and say well depends what you mean

hedge and say well depends what you mean

hedge and say well depends what you mean how would you vote let’s do an

how would you vote let’s do an

how would you vote let’s do an experiment

experiment

experiment I’m going to ask you about whether

I’m going to ask you about whether

I’m going to ask you about whether computers can think and you have to vote

computers can think and you have to vote

computers can think and you have to vote yes or no who’s a yes raise your hand

thank you who’s a No

thank you who’s a No raise your hand thank you about 75% of

raise your hand thank you about 75% of

raise your hand thank you about 75% of you think yes and a lot of you didn’t

you think yes and a lot of you didn’t

you think yes and a lot of you didn’t raise your hand and I’ve got your names

raise your hand and I’ve got your names

raise your hand and I’ve got your names let’s do another experiment um who

let’s do another experiment um who

let’s do another experiment um who thinks and you have to vote that

thinks and you have to vote that

thinks and you have to vote that computers could in principle have

computers could in principle have

computers could in principle have freewill if you were a yes raise your

freewill if you were a yes raise your

freewill if you were a yes raise your hand thank you

hand thank you

hand thank you all the knows raise your hand all right

all the knows raise your hand all right

all the knows raise your hand all right now I would say about 5% of you think

now I would say about 5% of you think

now I would say about 5% of you think computers could have free

computers could have free

computers could have free we’ll these are six questions that they

we’ll these are six questions that they

we’ll these are six questions that they used to ask at my class at Stanford for

used to ask at my class at Stanford for

used to ask at my class at Stanford for many years and I’d asked it twice at the

many years and I’d asked it twice at the

many years and I’d asked it twice at the beginning of the course and at the end

beginning of the course and at the end

beginning of the course and at the end and what invariably happened was that

and what invariably happened was that

and what invariably happened was that after we had discussed various aspects

after we had discussed various aspects

after we had discussed various aspects of artificial intelligence or AI and

of artificial intelligence or AI and

of artificial intelligence or AI and what it meant to compute the phrase of

what it meant to compute the phrase of

what it meant to compute the phrase of course computers can’t tended to

course computers can’t tended to

course computers can’t tended to disappear people were less sure of

disappear people were less sure of

disappear people were less sure of themselves and the vote at the end of

themselves and the vote at the end of

themselves and the vote at the end of the course was much more favorable to

the course was much more favorable to

the course was much more favorable to computers now in 15 minutes I don’t

computers now in 15 minutes I don’t

computers now in 15 minutes I don’t think we’ll achieve quite a

think we’ll achieve quite a

think we’ll achieve quite a transformation but I do hope we walk

transformation but I do hope we walk

transformation but I do hope we walk away with a new perspective and it’s not

away with a new perspective and it’s not

away with a new perspective and it’s not only a perspective about computers it’s

only a perspective about computers it’s

only a perspective about computers it’s also impressed mainly a perspective

also impressed mainly a perspective

also impressed mainly a perspective about ourselves as you know AI is the

about ourselves as you know AI is the

about ourselves as you know AI is the science and technology of getting

science and technology of getting

science and technology of getting computers to do smart things that we

computers to do smart things that we

computers to do smart things that we usually associate with people things

usually associate with people things

usually associate with people things like playing chess or speaking in

like playing chess or speaking in

like playing chess or speaking in English or diagnosing a disease telling

English or diagnosing a disease telling

English or diagnosing a disease telling a joke what do we know about AI in early

a joke what do we know about AI in early

a joke what do we know about AI in early 2017 first of all we know that everybody

2017 first of all we know that everybody

2017 first of all we know that everybody speaking about it from the New York

speaking about it from the New York

speaking about it from the New York Times from the White House to Dilbert we

Times from the White House to Dilbert we

Times from the White House to Dilbert we also know that AI is hugely successful

also know that AI is hugely successful

also know that AI is hugely successful especially in an era called machine

especially in an era called machine

especially in an era called machine learning computers can recognize cats

learning computers can recognize cats

learning computers can recognize cats and faces they can drive cars they can

and faces they can drive cars they can

and faces they can drive cars they can play recreational games extremely well

play recreational games extremely well

play recreational games extremely well beating world champions

beating world champions

beating world champions we know that industry is betting heavily

we know that industry is betting heavily

we know that industry is betting heavily on AI we also know that people are

on AI we also know that people are

on AI we also know that people are worried and there two kinds of worry the

worried and there two kinds of worry the

worried and there two kinds of worry the first kind is about negative

first kind is about negative

first kind is about negative implications of AI on society mostly

implications of AI on society mostly

implications of AI on society mostly unintended implications if cars can

unintended implications if cars can

unintended implications if cars can drive themselves does that mean that

drive themselves does that mean that

drive themselves does that mean that thousands of drivers will lose their

thousands of drivers will lose their

thousands of drivers will lose their jobs will biases that exist in say job

jobs will biases that exist in say job

jobs will biases that exist in say job interviews or loan applications get

interviews or loan applications get

interviews or loan applications get amplified by algorithms or robotic

amplified by algorithms or robotic

amplified by algorithms or robotic soldiers behave unethically in the

soldiers behave unethically in the

soldiers behave unethically in the battlefield

battlefield

battlefield these are very legitimate concerns and

these are very legitimate concerns and

these are very legitimate concerns and they deserve our attention as is the

they deserve our attention as is the

they deserve our attention as is the case with any disruptive technology we

case with any disruptive technology we

case with any disruptive technology we must ensure fair and ethical

must ensure fair and ethical

must ensure fair and ethical applications of AI and I think we can

applications of AI and I think we can

applications of AI and I think we can but the second kind of worry is deeper

but the second kind of worry is deeper

but the second kind of worry is deeper it’s visceral it’s existential it’s the

it’s visceral it’s existential it’s the

it’s visceral it’s existential it’s the worry that we people won’t be that

worry that we people won’t be that

worry that we people won’t be that special anymore that Westworld got it

special anymore that Westworld got it

special anymore that Westworld got it right we won’t be able to tell that

right we won’t be able to tell that

right we won’t be able to tell that people from the machines there’s a

people from the machines there’s a

people from the machines there’s a worst-case version of the worry in which

worst-case version of the worry in which

worst-case version of the worry in which the machines take over and replace us as

the machines take over and replace us as

the machines take over and replace us as the dominant species you’ve seen the

the dominant species you’ve seen the

the dominant species you’ve seen the salaat in science fiction and also in

salaat in science fiction and also in

salaat in science fiction and also in recent popular books you know the

recent popular books you know the

recent popular books you know the narrative you know we humans are made

narrative you know we humans are made

narrative you know we humans are made our contribution to evolution thank you

our contribution to evolution thank you

our contribution to evolution thank you very much but our service is no longer

very much but our service is no longer

very much but our service is no longer needed

needed

needed but even ignoring this evolutionary

but even ignoring this evolutionary

but even ignoring this evolutionary threat which by the way I think is

threat which by the way I think is

threat which by the way I think is overblown the question remains is there

overblown the question remains is there

overblown the question remains is there something that separates us from

something that separates us from

something that separates us from machines I’m going to answer this in two

machines I’m going to answer this in two

machines I’m going to answer this in two steps first I’ll scare the hell out of

steps first I’ll scare the hell out of

steps first I’ll scare the hell out of you

you

you and then I’ll not only calm you down but

and then I’ll not only calm you down but

and then I’ll not only calm you down but hopefully even excite you about the

hopefully even excite you about the

hopefully even excite you about the future

future

future so first the scary part and I’ll say it

so first the scary part and I’ll say it

so first the scary part and I’ll say it right now I believe that computers will

right now I believe that computers will

right now I believe that computers will exist exhibit most if not all of the

exist exhibit most if not all of the

exist exhibit most if not all of the traits that we view as uniquely human

traits that we view as uniquely human

traits that we view as uniquely human and yes that includes thinking and

and yes that includes thinking and

and yes that includes thinking and understanding and freewill and all the

understanding and freewill and all the

understanding and freewill and all the rest I’m not alone in thinking this most

rest I’m not alone in thinking this most

rest I’m not alone in thinking this most computer scientists I know tend to think

computer scientists I know tend to think

computer scientists I know tend to think this way it includes for example Alan

this way it includes for example Alan

this way it includes for example Alan Turing perhaps the most brilliant

Turing perhaps the most brilliant

Turing perhaps the most brilliant computer science of all times among

computer science of all times among

computer science of all times among other things

other things

other things Turing invented what we today call the

Turing invented what we today call the

Turing invented what we today call the Turing test which is a practical test of

Turing test which is a practical test of

Turing test which is a practical test of whether computer is intelligent and

whether computer is intelligent and

whether computer is intelligent and Turing thoughts already in 1950 that

Turing thoughts already in 1950 that

Turing thoughts already in 1950 that there was no reason computers could not

there was no reason computers could not

there was no reason computers could not and it includes John McCarthy the father

and it includes John McCarthy the father

and it includes John McCarthy the father of AI who coined the term in the 1950s

of AI who coined the term in the 1950s

of AI who coined the term in the 1950s now something this isn’t real thinking

now something this isn’t real thinking

now something this isn’t real thinking or understanding the thing is I’ve yet

or understanding the thing is I’ve yet

or understanding the thing is I’ve yet to see a single good argument perhaps

to see a single good argument perhaps

to see a single good argument perhaps the best argument I’ve seen was given by

the best argument I’ve seen was given by

the best argument I’ve seen was given by Ada Lovelace what makes her argument

Ada Lovelace what makes her argument

Ada Lovelace what makes her argument striking by the way is that

striking by the way is that

striking by the way is that in 1842 a century before Turing she was

in 1842 a century before Turing she was

in 1842 a century before Turing she was a very talented writer mathematician

a very talented writer mathematician

a very talented writer mathematician society woman she happened to be also

society woman she happened to be also

society woman she happened to be also the daughter of Lord Byron and she’s

the daughter of Lord Byron and she’s

the daughter of Lord Byron and she’s best known today for her work with

best known today for her work with

best known today for her work with Charles Babbage Babbage was a also a

Charles Babbage Babbage was a also a

Charles Babbage Babbage was a also a mathematician and he invented the first

mathematician and he invented the first

mathematician and he invented the first general-purpose computer although I

general-purpose computer although I

general-purpose computer although I never built it called the analytical

never built it called the analytical

never built it called the analytical engine he notes that lovely wrote about

engine he notes that lovely wrote about

engine he notes that lovely wrote about the analytical engine she included what

the analytical engine she included what

the analytical engine she included what many considered to be the first computer

many considered to be the first computer

many considered to be the first computer program in the world and even more

program in the world and even more

program in the world and even more remarkably she speculated about what

remarkably she speculated about what

remarkably she speculated about what today we would call artificial

today we would call artificial

today we would call artificial intelligence specifically she argued

intelligence specifically she argued

intelligence specifically she argued against the possibility of the computer

against the possibility of the computer

against the possibility of the computer being creative let’s see what she said

very sensible the computer just follows

very sensible the computer just follows instructions it has no original thought

instructions it has no original thought

instructions it has no original thought think about that this is 1842 a century

think about that this is 1842 a century

think about that this is 1842 a century before the first electronic computer

before the first electronic computer

before the first electronic computer it’s mind-blowing its mind-blowing but

it’s mind-blowing its mind-blowing but

it’s mind-blowing its mind-blowing but it’s also flawed in two ways first while

it’s also flawed in two ways first while

it’s also flawed in two ways first while Lovelace ISM insight into computing was

Lovelace ISM insight into computing was

Lovelace ISM insight into computing was astounding for her time by today’s

astounding for her time by today’s

astounding for her time by today’s standards this naive today AI is not

standards this naive today AI is not

standards this naive today AI is not characterized by handcrafted logical

characterized by handcrafted logical

characterized by handcrafted logical rules but by machine learning operating

rules but by machine learning operating

rules but by machine learning operating on machines a million times more

on machines a million times more

on machines a million times more powerful than she could imagine giving

powerful than she could imagine giving

powerful than she could imagine giving rise to programs that no human could

rise to programs that no human could

rise to programs that no human could have explicitly coded or even

have explicitly coded or even

have explicitly coded or even anticipated whether these are programs

anticipated whether these are programs

anticipated whether these are programs that beat a world champion of the game

that beat a world champion of the game

that beat a world champion of the game of Go or paint fantastical paintings the

of Go or paint fantastical paintings the

of Go or paint fantastical paintings the second flaw is even more basic notice

second flaw is even more basic notice

second flaw is even more basic notice let’s look again at what she wrote

let’s look again at what she wrote

let’s look again at what she wrote notice that she doesn’t give an argument

notice that she doesn’t give an argument

notice that she doesn’t give an argument she dresses her belief and appeals to

she dresses her belief and appeals to

she dresses her belief and appeals to our intuition and that is the case with

our intuition and that is the case with

our intuition and that is the case with all the arguments that followed the OL

all the arguments that followed the OL

all the arguments that followed the OL point boiled down to the idea of command

point boiled down to the idea of command

point boiled down to the idea of command this is ridiculous it just seems obvious

this is ridiculous it just seems obvious

this is ridiculous it just seems obvious to the critics

to the critics

to the critics that the computer can never really

that the computer can never really

that the computer can never really understand or think or what have you it

understand or think or what have you it

understand or think or what have you it can only mimic it superficially really

can only mimic it superficially really

can only mimic it superficially really and how would you know the real thing if

and how would you know the real thing if

and how would you know the real thing if you saw it it reminds me of one of the

you saw it it reminds me of one of the

you saw it it reminds me of one of the stories of the Wiseman of helm that

stories of the Wiseman of helm that

stories of the Wiseman of helm that fictional group are very silly people

fictional group are very silly people

fictional group are very silly people from Eastern European Jewish folklore in

from Eastern European Jewish folklore in

from Eastern European Jewish folklore in this story the man gets up in the

this story the man gets up in the

this story the man gets up in the morning and says goodbye to his wife and

morning and says goodbye to his wife and

morning and says goodbye to his wife and kids and sets out from the small town of

kids and sets out from the small town of

kids and sets out from the small town of helm to the big town city of Warsaw and

helm to the big town city of Warsaw and

helm to the big town city of Warsaw and along the way gets lost through some

along the way gets lost through some

along the way gets lost through some funny circumstances and ends back in

funny circumstances and ends back in

funny circumstances and ends back in hell but thinking arrived in Warsaw and

hell but thinking arrived in Warsaw and

hell but thinking arrived in Warsaw and he’s struck by its resemblance to his

he’s struck by its resemblance to his

he’s struck by its resemblance to his hometown there’s a street just like his

hometown there’s a street just like his

hometown there’s a street just like his and a house very much like he’s an

and a house very much like he’s an

and a house very much like he’s an amazingly a family so much like his own

amazingly a family so much like his own

amazingly a family so much like his own family nice people they invite him in

family nice people they invite him in

family nice people they invite him in they feed him and he wants when he wants

they feed him and he wants when he wants

they feed him and he wants when he wants to leave they won’t let him so we spent

to leave they won’t let him so we spent

to leave they won’t let him so we spent the recipe line is life with these

the recipe line is life with these

the recipe line is life with these wonderful people and is always homesick

wonderful people and is always homesick

wonderful people and is always homesick and that is how it is with the sceptics

and that is how it is with the sceptics

and that is how it is with the sceptics of AI it doesn’t matter if the computer

of AI it doesn’t matter if the computer

of AI it doesn’t matter if the computer works like a duck and talks like a DAC

works like a duck and talks like a DAC

works like a duck and talks like a DAC for them somehow the real thing is

for them somehow the real thing is

for them somehow the real thing is mysteriously different now am I saying

mysteriously different now am I saying

mysteriously different now am I saying that I know for a fact that a computer

that I know for a fact that a computer

that I know for a fact that a computer will exhibit the full range of human

will exhibit the full range of human

will exhibit the full range of human mental activity no I’m quite sure about

mental activity no I’m quite sure about

mental activity no I’m quite sure about thinking and understanding if you just

thinking and understanding if you just

thinking and understanding if you just look at even today’s programs that

look at even today’s programs that

look at even today’s programs that diagnose diseases better than doctors

diagnose diseases better than doctors

diagnose diseases better than doctors that approve loan applications much more

that approve loan applications much more

that approve loan applications much more reasonably than humans that grade

reasonably than humans that grade

reasonably than humans that grade homework online and so on how good must

homework online and so on how good must

homework online and so on how good must they be before you concede that they

they be before you concede that they

they be before you concede that they understand what they’re talking about it

understand what they’re talking about it

understand what they’re talking about it may not be exactly our understanding but

may not be exactly our understanding but

may not be exactly our understanding but we don’t say that an airplane can’t fly

we don’t say that an airplane can’t fly

we don’t say that an airplane can’t fly just because it doesn’t fly like a bird

just because it doesn’t fly like a bird

just because it doesn’t fly like a bird and I’m also quite sure about creativity

and I’m also quite sure about creativity

and I’m also quite sure about creativity and it’s not only because of that

and it’s not only because of that

and it’s not only because of that painting we saw earlier on a recent

painting we saw earlier on a recent

painting we saw earlier on a recent version of Google Translate the program

version of Google Translate the program

version of Google Translate the program that translates between languages like

that translates between languages like

that translates between languages like English and French invented or on its

English and French invented or on its

English and French invented or on its own and internal language to help with

own and internal language to help with

own and internal language to help with this translation it surprised everyone

this translation it surprised everyone

this translation it surprised everyone not the least the people who wrote the

not the least the people who wrote the

not the least the people who wrote the program

program

program and I’m told that expert go programs

and I’m told that expert go programs

and I’m told that expert go programs were in awe of the originality of the

were in awe of the originality of the

were in awe of the originality of the alphago program so much so that they

alphago program so much so that they

alphago program so much so that they named one of the moves after the program

named one of the moves after the program

named one of the moves after the program so I’m a YES on thinking understanding

so I’m a YES on thinking understanding

so I’m a YES on thinking understanding creativity I tend to think that the same

creativity I tend to think that the same

creativity I tend to think that the same is true of things like feelings and

is true of things like feelings and

is true of things like feelings and freewill and consciousness although I’m

freewill and consciousness although I’m

freewill and consciousness although I’m not yet ready to argue it these are more

not yet ready to argue it these are more

not yet ready to argue it these are more subtle notions certainly some have

subtle notions certainly some have

subtle notions certainly some have argued like the late John McCarthy who I

argued like the late John McCarthy who I

argued like the late John McCarthy who I mentioned earlier on I myself think that

mentioned earlier on I myself think that

mentioned earlier on I myself think that the jury is still out but I wouldn’t bet

the jury is still out but I wouldn’t bet

the jury is still out but I wouldn’t bet against the machine so this is scary

against the machine so this is scary

against the machine so this is scary computers can think understand be

computers can think understand be

computers can think understand be creative and maybe even have feelings

creative and maybe even have feelings

creative and maybe even have feelings and free will and be conscious that mean

and free will and be conscious that mean

and free will and be conscious that mean that we’re nothing but glorified laptops

that we’re nothing but glorified laptops

that we’re nothing but glorified laptops perhaps to be replaced by a newer and

perhaps to be replaced by a newer and

perhaps to be replaced by a newer and better model it doesn’t feel very good

better model it doesn’t feel very good

better model it doesn’t feel very good and so natural to reject an idea because

and so natural to reject an idea because

and so natural to reject an idea because it scares us but fear is a very poor

it scares us but fear is a very poor

it scares us but fear is a very poor guide and this is where the story gets

guide and this is where the story gets

guide and this is where the story gets happy again if you just shift

happy again if you just shift

happy again if you just shift perspective you see not a threat but a

perspective you see not a threat but a

perspective you see not a threat but a very exciting opportunity you see that

very exciting opportunity you see that

very exciting opportunity you see that it’s not about the answers it’s about

it’s not about the answers it’s about

it’s not about the answers it’s about the questions and it’s not about

the questions and it’s not about

the questions and it’s not about computers versus humans then versus us

computers versus humans then versus us

computers versus humans then versus us it’s not even about them at all it’s

it’s not even about them at all it’s

it’s not even about them at all it’s really about us and that’s for two

really about us and that’s for two

really about us and that’s for two reasons first computers already now

reasons first computers already now

reasons first computers already now extend our cognitive skills but they

extend our cognitive skills but they

extend our cognitive skills but they tend to be physically separate and made

tend to be physically separate and made

tend to be physically separate and made of metal but that’ll change our nervous

of metal but that’ll change our nervous

of metal but that’ll change our nervous system will connect wirelessly to giant

system will connect wirelessly to giant

system will connect wirelessly to giant data centers and our blood streams will

data centers and our blood streams will

data centers and our blood streams will carry thousands of nano computers

carry thousands of nano computers

carry thousands of nano computers fighting diseases so it’ll be less clear

fighting diseases so it’ll be less clear

fighting diseases so it’ll be less clear where we end in the computer begins but

where we end in the computer begins but

where we end in the computer begins but even more basically we just don’t

even more basically we just don’t

even more basically we just don’t understand these notions take free will

understand these notions take free will

understand these notions take free will I’m sure that when you bear you voted

I’m sure that when you bear you voted

I’m sure that when you bear you voted earlier on on on free will you were

earlier on on on free will you were

earlier on on on free will you were asking yourself well what is it and what

asking yourself well what is it and what

asking yourself well what is it and what does it mean for me to have free will

does it mean for me to have free will

does it mean for me to have free will that’s certainly what the students in my

that’s certainly what the students in my

that’s certainly what the students in my class asked and they quickly concluded

class asked and they quickly concluded

class asked and they quickly concluded that we don’t know certainly a ton has

that we don’t know certainly a ton has

that we don’t know certainly a ton has been written about it I recently spoke

been written about it I recently spoke

been written about it I recently spoke with a very smart friend of mine a

with a very smart friend of mine a

with a very smart friend of mine a technologist who happen to be religious

technologist who happen to be religious

technologist who happen to be religious and I asked him about the famous quote

and I asked him about the famous quote

and I asked him about the famous quote of Rabbi Akiva I called Sephora Bella

of Rabbi Akiva I called Sephora Bella

of Rabbi Akiva I called Sephora Bella shoot mucuna all he’s foreseen and free

shoot mucuna all he’s foreseen and free

shoot mucuna all he’s foreseen and free will is granted I asked him whether he

will is granted I asked him whether he

will is granted I asked him whether he needed in his opinion it resolved the

needed in his opinion it resolved the

needed in his opinion it resolved the obvious tension between divine

obvious tension between divine

obvious tension between divine omniscience and free will he admitted

omniscience and free will he admitted

omniscience and free will he admitted that probably not although later he sent

that probably not although later he sent

that probably not although later he sent me some writing by his rabbi on it

me some writing by his rabbi on it

me some writing by his rabbi on it philosophers of course had done battle

philosophers of course had done battle

philosophers of course had done battle with free will for a long time for

with free will for a long time for

with free will for a long time for example there’s a wonderful story by the

example there’s a wonderful story by the

example there’s a wonderful story by the philosopher and logician raiments

philosopher and logician raiments

philosopher and logician raiments mullion the story is not really this is

mullion the story is not really this is

mullion the story is not really this is not Dumbledore this is mullion although

not Dumbledore this is mullion although

not Dumbledore this is mullion although it’s true the smullin was also a

it’s true the smullin was also a

it’s true the smullin was also a magician the story is called is God a

magician the story is called is God a

magician the story is called is God a Taoists and the moral of the story is

Taoists and the moral of the story is

Taoists and the moral of the story is that it makes no logical sense for a

that it makes no logical sense for a

that it makes no logical sense for a person to not want to have free will

person to not want to have free will

person to not want to have free will think about it’s fascinating perhaps my

think about it’s fascinating perhaps my

think about it’s fascinating perhaps my favorite quote on free will comes from

favorite quote on free will comes from

favorite quote on free will comes from literature from Isaac to share the

literature from Isaac to share the

literature from Isaac to share the zingers Nobel Prize speech where we said

zingers Nobel Prize speech where we said

zingers Nobel Prize speech where we said we have to believe in free will we have

we have to believe in free will we have

we have to believe in free will we have no choice what all these quotes have in

no choice what all these quotes have in

no choice what all these quotes have in common is that they’re clever they’re

common is that they’re clever they’re

common is that they’re clever they’re thought-provoking they’re entertaining

thought-provoking they’re entertaining

thought-provoking they’re entertaining they don’t tell us what free will is and

they don’t tell us what free will is and

they don’t tell us what free will is and we’re in no better shape when it comes

we’re in no better shape when it comes

we’re in no better shape when it comes to consciousness and perhaps only

to consciousness and perhaps only

to consciousness and perhaps only marginally better when it comes to

marginally better when it comes to

marginally better when it comes to feelings so it’s not that we don’t

feelings so it’s not that we don’t

feelings so it’s not that we don’t understand computers we don’t understand

understand computers we don’t understand

understand computers we don’t understand ourselves and this to me is where it

ourselves and this to me is where it

ourselves and this to me is where it gets exciting

gets exciting

gets exciting you see AI in addition to its practical

you see AI in addition to its practical

you see AI in addition to its practical contributions is propelling us towards

contributions is propelling us towards

contributions is propelling us towards the ultimate intellectual frontier

the ultimate intellectual frontier

the ultimate intellectual frontier understanding our minds our souls

understanding our minds our souls

understanding our minds our souls ourselves because at the end what do we

ourselves because at the end what do we

ourselves because at the end what do we care about we certainly care about not

care about we certainly care about not

care about we certainly care about not dying of cold and hunger and not being

dying of cold and hunger and not being

dying of cold and hunger and not being eaten by predators and that’s also true

eaten by predators and that’s also true

eaten by predators and that’s also true of lizards we want to love and be loved

of lizards we want to love and be loved

of lizards we want to love and be loved and that’s true of my dog and then what

and that’s true of my dog and then what

and that’s true of my dog and then what we have the sense that is more to our

we have the sense that is more to our

we have the sense that is more to our life than survival and companionship we

life than survival and companionship we

life than survival and companionship we don’t end the day and we say I wasn’t

don’t end the day and we say I wasn’t

don’t end the day and we say I wasn’t eaten by a lion that was a good day we

eaten by a lion that was a good day we

eaten by a lion that was a good day we look back at the day we look back in our

look back at the day we look back in our

look back at the day we look back in our life and we take satisfaction in what

life and we take satisfaction in what

life and we take satisfaction in what you

you

you in what we’ve learned on how we acted on

in what we’ve learned on how we acted on

in what we’ve learned on how we acted on the impact we had on others are the nice

the impact we had on others are the nice

the impact we had on others are the nice things people said about us but for that

things people said about us but for that

things people said about us but for that to make sense we have to think of

to make sense we have to think of

to make sense we have to think of ourselves as creatures with thoughts and

ourselves as creatures with thoughts and

ourselves as creatures with thoughts and beliefs and feelings aware of ourselves

beliefs and feelings aware of ourselves

beliefs and feelings aware of ourselves and of each other

and of each other

and of each other able to take our actions freely so to

able to take our actions freely so to

able to take our actions freely so to understand ourselves we need to

understand ourselves we need to

understand ourselves we need to understand these things

understand these things

understand these things we have various tools for this we have

we have various tools for this we have

we have various tools for this we have neuroscience and yes we have philosophy

neuroscience and yes we have philosophy

neuroscience and yes we have philosophy of the rest but AI is giving us the

of the rest but AI is giving us the

of the rest but AI is giving us the really interesting new lens through

really interesting new lens through

really interesting new lens through which to think about these issues the

which to think about these issues the

which to think about these issues the question about whether the question of

question about whether the question of

question about whether the question of whether machines can embody these

whether machines can embody these

whether machines can embody these notions and we should ask this question

notions and we should ask this question

notions and we should ask this question boldly perhaps we’ll find that essential

boldly perhaps we’ll find that essential

boldly perhaps we’ll find that essential nugget that separates us from machines

nugget that separates us from machines

nugget that separates us from machines and certainly the contrast with machines

and certainly the contrast with machines

and certainly the contrast with machines will tell us something about ourselves

will tell us something about ourselves

will tell us something about ourselves perhaps we won’t find that nugget that

perhaps we won’t find that nugget that

perhaps we won’t find that nugget that will also tell us something about

will also tell us something about

will also tell us something about ourselves and it won’t demean us either

ourselves and it won’t demean us either

ourselves and it won’t demean us either our sense of self-worth shouldn’t depend

our sense of self-worth shouldn’t depend

our sense of self-worth shouldn’t depend on putting down the machine in both

on putting down the machine in both

on putting down the machine in both cases we learn something about ourselves

cases we learn something about ourselves

cases we learn something about ourselves and as the great philosopher Martha

and as the great philosopher Martha

and as the great philosopher Martha Stewart said that’s a good thing before

Stewart said that’s a good thing before

Stewart said that’s a good thing before I end I have a request please all go to

I end I have a request please all go to

I end I have a request please all go to the website could computers o RG and

the website could computers o RG and

the website could computers o RG and vote on these six questions this goes to

vote on these six questions this goes to

vote on these six questions this goes to everyone here in the audience or

everyone here in the audience or

everyone here in the audience or watching it live elsewhere or recording

watching it live elsewhere or recording

watching it live elsewhere or recording later on please go ahead and vote and

later on please go ahead and vote and

later on please go ahead and vote and you can vote many times perhaps you’ll

you can vote many times perhaps you’ll

you can vote many times perhaps you’ll read something interesting the New York

read something interesting the New York

read something interesting the New York Times or a la ohm maybe you’ll have a

Times or a la ohm maybe you’ll have a

Times or a la ohm maybe you’ll have a conversation with your yoga instructor

conversation with your yoga instructor

conversation with your yoga instructor maybe you’ll hear an interesting TED

maybe you’ll hear an interesting TED

maybe you’ll hear an interesting TED talk by all means go ahead and revote by

talk by all means go ahead and revote by

talk by all means go ahead and revote by the way they should have allowed that

the way they should have allowed that

the way they should have allowed that for brexit but that’s a different story

for brexit but that’s a different story

for brexit but that’s a different story we will collect these votes and see how

we will collect these votes and see how

we will collect these votes and see how as a society we feel about these issues

as a society we feel about these issues

as a society we feel about these issues and how that evolved over time and let’s

and how that evolved over time and let’s

and how that evolved over time and let’s not only vote let’s start a conversation

not only vote let’s start a conversation

not only vote let’s start a conversation about it and if we’re lucky we will have

about it and if we’re lucky we will have

about it and if we’re lucky we will have a better understanding

a better understanding

a better understanding not only of computers and of AI but also

not only of computers and of AI but also

not only of computers and of AI but also of what it means to be a human being

of what it means to be a human being

of what it means to be a human being thank

”

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *