[Applause]
begins my speech by remembering together
with you a very long period
in the Brazilian context
quite current including my daughter
until the year 2013 where the history
Brazil was marked by a set of
of expressions a set of
manifestations in which the
which I believe several of you
participated either with the flag or
with a poster or even from a
live monitoring on networks
on the internet and on television
My daughter here is the great
demonstrations that took to the streets
Brazilians in the year 2013 and
known as June days or which
a brazilian candle
this movement ended up going to the
story and brings us a series of
clues to understand a little of how the
democratic national constitution
Brazilian was scored
historically because of this
phenomenon
obviously when I want to make a
deep analysis of this movement
but a central feature is very
important agent to carry out an analysis
this scenario and here I am referring to
how this movement organized itself
if structured effectively mobilized
a central element was precisely the
internet and the technologies of
information and communication networks
social
It is interesting to note that what
happened in 2013
had been studied for a long time by a
of researchers that all
researchers pointed out that there is no
resonance between motion
happened for example in social networks
on the internet and obviously what
happened in the streets
what happened periodically or
could happen for example
manifestations
this dissonance that many
researchers pointed out is was obviously
by land in 2013
just to show you what we
wins
before 2013 in 2008 there was a
movement called out sarney
the deceased continuing this movement is
the best people to evaluate millions of
people arguing is that we
we criticize proposing alternatives yet
when there is a type of proposition
to go to the streets were the
squares no disease of
people could be being able to be
mobilized for what Socrates does
head that much year ie
effectively got stuck on the internet
I was trapped
the indignation she holds in the networks
which turns out to be interesting
marked in the case of
2013 is that people leave facebook
the internet fact movement goes to
the streets take to the streets in a moment is
with several voices with various ideas
with several proposals various demands
as diverse as creative and
It’s obviously interesting to
that we understand this scenario that
she demonstrates about the transport
on public services on
quality of education, the quality of
and obviously rewarding all of this.
we have the most glaring demand that
demand for more participation
demand for people to have
their voices are somehow met
as a clamor put to own
state
these demands and this episode as a
everything for administration
public places for democracy
challenges in Brazil
the set challenges that still have to
being digested still has to be
worked but obviously every
more central to be considered
starting democratic professional
It’s worth it to understand that
democracy in the format it is today is
still understood as a field of dispute
in the field of dispute where concepts
different and her own practice
can be signified and risk
stings it is interesting to note
example that the march does not
argues that democracy is great
conquest of humanity in the
video we try to have a little bit
the extent of what this means for
all of us
obviously we are still very far
of that revolutionary aspiration which
is democracy is at the beginning of
your story
we are still a long way from a
effectiveness of what democracy is
we can say maybe up to 1o
sad that democracy at the present time is
summaries in bulk to the
vote that it presents and summarizes the
roughly to suffrage
This is very little too little.
considering democracy while the
power of control of the government and
remember it is exercised by the people to
to carry out all its challenges
all your demands with the state
we have a lot to walk to do
democracy actually comes out of this
structure of this structure by
sometimes creeping and speech be converted
in which it has the potential to
transform society
today, democracy ends up being many
times only read while its shape
if I have suffrage if I have a vote
has democracy
Like I said, it ‘s too little democracy.
go to the auction
besides the ball it has to go beyond
blog she votes obviously going beyond
understanding and if the law includes
effectively the participation of the
society
the participation of citizens in
participation of the actors that make up
society as a whole bringing
problems by bringing solutions and
collectively building these
alternatives and this ends up being
It is interesting to perceive
only as a form but also as
also how much content
This is central to getting people to
overcome and even understand some of the
week
the actions ended up happening and take
in Brazil in 2013
It is fundamental for us, for example,
that democracy must be
democratized
how says boaventura de sousa santos
perhaps a more intense democracy a
democracy in the speeches boaventura that goes
from bed to factory
It’s obvious that we have a very
great to walk as a society
while collective is that this fact
if a reality is fulfilled
in the same way as this challenge
for the whole Brazilian society when
to discuss democracy from the prism and
of the advent of the movement in 2013
the public administration itself
also comes together from
challenges is
absolutely urgent
note that the public administration
in particular have to deal with
demands that are placed by the
society and at the same time seem to
be contradictory to launch the
society calls for faster more
speed and less red tape
at the same time she wants more
that wants to be heard until
have a social control how do I
I’ll be both quick and agile
hear everyone make room for everyone
are things that can sound
contradictory to listen to people from
bases for the participation demand
effectively demands time effectively
to effectively carry out the work of
is not something done in the evening
for the day
and this central feature for the
people understand maybe the challenge is
put that is placed as
to reconcile this scenario as
to reconcile these tensions that
same time they charge me agility and time
for discussion time for ugly debates
for participation
and here maybe an essay for this
response to a suggestion that I invite
you to reflect
thousand may be thinking all this or
integrate all this from that
characteristic that I said in the beginning
of my speech and that is what was
used to mobilize movements
in 2013
I mean here the technologies
information and communication
perhaps employing such techniques in the
public management
we have the ability to give voice to
more people
we must apply it to the
capillarity of this tool and
to bring this information so that the
decision as to obviously remain
according to which the society that is
the headquarters of information and internet in
special by its format communication
carries this potential that many times
It is underexploited technologies of
information when combined by
example with this idea of democracy and
participation
she can she can boost all
these voices that often
hidden secrets that now begin to
body on the streets Eca potentiation
effectively accomplishing this
can effectively take place from these
technologies and here obviously a means
wire technology one marketing
purely and simply the technology that I
I think I bring it here.
reflect social technology
the open source free software that
has a very connected character with the
own model of democracy because the
Instead of a democracy more comment
democracy before a democracy of
content that has effectively
condition to bring to all names
to bring to society a logical
of collective construction and if this is the
model that can be used by people
thinking about a social and
think even a social innovation
integrating democracy
participation and technologies we can
social renewal and more
Here again I do not mean innovation
marketplace plus an innovation that
have in their own citizenship actors
central to its constitution to
open innovation that is per hour by
example to different porous looks
for example to different problems
understanding that not only knowledge
scientist who will build some
new reality a fact of fact
trainer ‘s own popular knowledge
when combined with the knowledge
collective is in a position to bring
very effective solutions for
problems that we win our
for problems that afflict us
at times this characteristic advancing
central we think about this
transformation we think about this
change of reality and to try to
show all this I would like to talk
with you about three good experiences
interesting things that make
combination
the first one is the budget
< Previous Next>
participatory approach is a
the 1980s in which people are
insert into ideas
discussions on the budget
municipal
just to illustrate just to make it clear
for all is part of the
budget that the city hall
that the city is obviously run to
public status of the
what we have to do is
while a feature the winner
with a characteristic to democratize the
digital participatory budgeting
that this dynamic of discussion of
budget piece happens a
within the internet itself
citizenship could
give an opinion on what to
society from the internet that the
phone 0 800 for example the
brazil was a pioneer in this experience
in 2006 in the city of belo horizonte
and it is interesting to note that people
combining this dynamic of bringing
options bring bringing visions and
I hope people participate internally
can be very effective in achieving
a new reality
another example that I bring to
you
was there in the big river of the south operated
years of a state government in 2010 2009
2010 called digital cabinet
gabriel kick quite interesting
because different the budget app
participatory he was in a good store
more integrated and has, for
very strong dimension that the size of the
social control the dimension given to
insertion of citizenship of the population
in control of problems in the control of
public works eg the cabinet
has the merit of making a
direct link between citizenship and
government without immediate intermediaries
obviously over the internet and this does all
the difference
an example that the team for you already
the functionality of the functions of
digital cabinet involves for example the
inspection of works
I think everyone has already come across a
plate like this one works board
public
but you have tactical formations about
for example the value of the work
characteristics
Anyway, it’s just you only end up being this one.
plate because this ends up being very
limited in terms of information to
the social control the digital cabinet was
quite an interesting thing
the works that were led by the power
public received plaques like this one but
also received codes in this format
what is coaching this type of
code you should find by
example packaging such as
the various is the packaging type of
manufactured goods have a
interesting feature that is
precisely the ability to laugh at you
to others for access to other
information
so what happened this episode of
digital life you had work
the board is approaching your cell phone
this barcode and was
automatically dismissed a site that
you saw in a dynamic way like that
work is developing as one
to that process the steps that
was being expired a name that had
that condition was in a position to
this way of pointing for example speak
about what was agreed or not
disagreement with what was being
pointed out in the own
application and in relation to the
it was being done there in front of you
several were with the resignations in
that people were pointing cell phones
indicated percentage
finished and saw that it was different
the reality
obviously that actions end up
happening and generated a great
effectiveness in practices that
tool or, once again, it has a
combination of democracy and
technology and generating participation
improving public services generating
quality improvement in the
a third experiment for more
combined or integrated with this logic
involves the so-called living laboratory
social collaboratory sao paulo but
we have some laboratory examples
social laboratories and nobody
also several experiences in
social laboratories
God
social laboratories integrate
citizens and citizens integrate
entrepreneurs are members of
third sector technical universities
of the city hall after
world at last everyone is arguing
collectively a public problem what
It is interesting that the parties can
to be on a voluntary basis
the alternatives are created from the
established collaborative dynamics
between people
own participation in this environment
is done is defined by the participants
generating what we call goal
participation
I have in this context of the laboratory
I live then a central opportunity
so that people can create
solutions from the problems that
they live or people can
think social problems discuss
collectively and making a process of
production of the public good in which
all are actors recognized as
Equals are all recognized actors
with voice
all are recognized actors and
ability to think solutions to
your problems
so this is a very
interesting that can be thought to
that we effectively build a
much more effective democracy in
countries where it happens more
solidarity and that effectively achieves
bring all of us a look a look
much more integrated among the problems
for example between different
It’s different from the one we’re facing
several products were
experience a digital moratorium and
softwares and dynamic processes
And all this gives us hope of
a rather interesting clarity that
that when we integrate democracy
participation and technology
conditions to make a
transformation in society
we have full conditions to make a
democracy
effective because democracy can and must
beyond the vote
thank you guys
[Applause]
”
Be First to Comment