Press "Enter" to skip to content

Why politics make us mean and stupid | John Noonan | TEDxMidAtlantic


I was at a Republican policy summit and

I was at a Republican policy summit and I was speaking there a couple months ago

I was speaking there a couple months ago

I was speaking there a couple months ago and it was a really cool event we had

and it was a really cool event we had

and it was a really cool event we had policy experts and pollsters that

policy experts and pollsters that

policy experts and pollsters that strategists and just a really neat

strategists and just a really neat

strategists and just a really neat opportunity to learn and understand our

opportunity to learn and understand our

opportunity to learn and understand our political process and I was struck by a

political process and I was struck by a

political process and I was struck by a question that we got it’s a nice old

question that we got it’s a nice old

question that we got it’s a nice old Southern guy in the back of the room who

Southern guy in the back of the room who

Southern guy in the back of the room who stood up kind of jammed his finger out

stood up kind of jammed his finger out

stood up kind of jammed his finger out and said do you all know and by the way

and said do you all know and by the way

and said do you all know and by the way if you’re familiar with the South if

if you’re familiar with the South if

if you’re familiar with the South if somebody points their finger at you and

somebody points their finger at you and

somebody points their finger at you and says do you all know they’re not about

says do you all know they’re not about

says do you all know they’re not about to tell you that they like your biscuits

just how angry we are and it wasn’t the

just how angry we are and it wasn’t the question that I found so memorable it

question that I found so memorable it

question that I found so memorable it was the reaction it brought the house

was the reaction it brought the house

was the reaction it brought the house down people are angry and I was struck

down people are angry and I was struck

down people are angry and I was struck by the fact that here we are in a deep

by the fact that here we are in a deep

by the fact that here we are in a deep red state at the local county and state

red state at the local county and state

red state at the local county and state level it’s all run by Republicans and

level it’s all run by Republicans and

level it’s all run by Republicans and this was a donor event so the American

this was a donor event so the American

this was a donor event so the American Dream had to have been good enough to

Dream had to have been good enough to

Dream had to have been good enough to these people to so that they could

these people to so that they could

these people to so that they could donate money to a think tank

donate money to a think tank

donate money to a think tank they were prosperous and I think that’s

they were prosperous and I think that’s

they were prosperous and I think that’s a totally worth totally worthwhile use

a totally worth totally worthwhile use

a totally worth totally worthwhile use of funds I’m not criticizing that at all

of funds I’m not criticizing that at all

of funds I’m not criticizing that at all one thing that I found is I’ve been

one thing that I found is I’ve been

one thing that I found is I’ve been exploring this is that it’s not just a

exploring this is that it’s not just a

exploring this is that it’s not just a Republican dynamic this is a chart pew

Republican dynamic this is a chart pew

Republican dynamic this is a chart pew does this and they’ve tracked it for

does this and they’ve tracked it for

does this and they’ve tracked it for decades it’s a great set of data it

decades it’s a great set of data it

decades it’s a great set of data it tracks the level of trust that we as

tracks the level of trust that we as

tracks the level of trust that we as Americans have in our government and I

Americans have in our government and I

Americans have in our government and I want you to pay attention to the time

want you to pay attention to the time

want you to pay attention to the time from 2000 until 2010 now you’ll see that

from 2000 until 2010 now you’ll see that

from 2000 until 2010 now you’ll see that drop and you might say well George Bush

drop and you might say well George Bush

drop and you might say well George Bush was kind of a controversial president

was kind of a controversial president

was kind of a controversial president and that’s probably the reason for it

and that’s probably the reason for it

and that’s probably the reason for it maybe but I would submit to you that it

maybe but I would submit to you that it

maybe but I would submit to you that it went to its lowest level ever under

went to its lowest level ever under

went to its lowest level ever under President Obama which tells you what

President Obama which tells you what

President Obama which tells you what it’s bipartisan any time in politics

it’s bipartisan any time in politics

it’s bipartisan any time in politics where you have only twenty percent of

where you have only twenty percent of

where you have only twenty percent of people agreeing on something or 80

people agreeing on something or 80

people agreeing on something or 80 percent of people agreeing on something

percent of people agreeing on something

percent of people agreeing on something it’s it’s a bipartisan

it’s it’s a bipartisan

it’s it’s a bipartisan concerns bipartisan issue I would submit

concerns bipartisan issue I would submit

concerns bipartisan issue I would submit something different something’s changed

something different something’s changed

something different something’s changed radio revolutionized the way we interact

radio revolutionized the way we interact

radio revolutionized the way we interact with politics television did the same

with politics television did the same

with politics television did the same the Internet has done the same thing

the Internet has done the same thing

the Internet has done the same thing only to an exponential level more than

only to an exponential level more than

only to an exponential level more than radio more than TV

radio more than TV

radio more than TV we no longer ingest news to be informed

we no longer ingest news to be informed

we no longer ingest news to be informed anymore we ingest news to be validated

anymore we ingest news to be validated

anymore we ingest news to be validated and during this time period you see

and during this time period you see

and during this time period you see you’ve seen the rise of Fox News the

you’ve seen the rise of Fox News the

you’ve seen the rise of Fox News the rise of MSNBC the rise of opinion blogs

rise of MSNBC the rise of opinion blogs

rise of MSNBC the rise of opinion blogs where it’s no longer Walter Cronkite

where it’s no longer Walter Cronkite

where it’s no longer Walter Cronkite getting up at 6 o’clock and saying who

getting up at 6 o’clock and saying who

getting up at 6 o’clock and saying who what where when why this is what

what where when why this is what

what where when why this is what happened this is why it happened this is

happened this is why it happened this is

happened this is why it happened this is how it happened so it’s it’s

how it happened so it’s it’s

how it happened so it’s it’s fundamentally changed and it’s having a

fundamentally changed and it’s having a

fundamentally changed and it’s having a negative impact on the country at a

negative impact on the country at a

negative impact on the country at a micro and a macro level it’s having a

micro and a macro level it’s having a

micro and a macro level it’s having a negative impact on us this is another

negative impact on us this is another

negative impact on us this is another chart from pew and you can see how the

chart from pew and you can see how the

chart from pew and you can see how the center has effectively disappeared over

center has effectively disappeared over

center has effectively disappeared over the past 10 years some of you may

the past 10 years some of you may

the past 10 years some of you may remember the grand bargain of 2011

remember the grand bargain of 2011

remember the grand bargain of 2011 President Obama was facing a Republican

President Obama was facing a Republican

President Obama was facing a Republican House for the first time him and Speaker

House for the first time him and Speaker

House for the first time him and Speaker Boehner had got together and they said

Boehner had got together and they said

Boehner had got together and they said there’s a few key things that we want to

there’s a few key things that we want to

there’s a few key things that we want to work on there’s a few key things that we

work on there’s a few key things that we

work on there’s a few key things that we want to work out and they got together

want to work out and they got together

want to work out and they got together and it would have if they called the

and it would have if they called the

and it would have if they called the grand bargain for a reason it would have

grand bargain for a reason it would have

grand bargain for a reason it would have been one of the most consequential deals

been one of the most consequential deals

been one of the most consequential deals in the last 20 or 30 years it would have

in the last 20 or 30 years it would have

in the last 20 or 30 years it would have reformed the way entitlements work and

reformed the way entitlements work and

reformed the way entitlements work and our tax code and modernized the way the

our tax code and modernized the way the

our tax code and modernized the way the government regulates so it’s easier for

government regulates so it’s easier for

government regulates so it’s easier for businesses to grow and thrive and

businesses to grow and thrive and

businesses to grow and thrive and entrepreneurs to do their job and it

entrepreneurs to do their job and it

entrepreneurs to do their job and it blew up both sides point the finger at

blew up both sides point the finger at

blew up both sides point the finger at each other of course we are in

each other of course we are in

each other of course we are in Washington DC but I think there was one

Washington DC but I think there was one

Washington DC but I think there was one thing that both sides agreed on and that

thing that both sides agreed on and that

thing that both sides agreed on and that was neither of them could sell the deal

was neither of them could sell the deal

was neither of them could sell the deal to their base that’s reflected in that

to their base that’s reflected in that

to their base that’s reflected in that graph it’s not a Republican issue it’s

graph it’s not a Republican issue it’s

graph it’s not a Republican issue it’s not a democratic issue

not a democratic issue

not a democratic issue we’re just siloed and weren’t entrenched

we’re just siloed and weren’t entrenched

we’re just siloed and weren’t entrenched in our own political beliefs beliefs and

in our own political beliefs beliefs and

in our own political beliefs beliefs and it goes back to that media dynamic where

it goes back to that media dynamic where

it goes back to that media dynamic where we can search and shop for the news that

we can search and shop for the news that

we can search and shop for the news that we want to hear we’re not a people

we want to hear we’re not a people

we want to hear we’re not a people separated by two different

separated by two different

separated by two different opinions were people separated by

opinions were people separated by

opinions were people separated by different realities that’s all we’re

different realities that’s all we’re

different realities that’s all we’re hurting ourselves on the macro level

hurting ourselves on the macro level

hurting ourselves on the macro level let’s talk about how it’s hurting us on

let’s talk about how it’s hurting us on

let’s talk about how it’s hurting us on the micro level we have a family friend

the micro level we have a family friend

the micro level we have a family friend and it’s kind of a sitcom dynamic where

and it’s kind of a sitcom dynamic where

and it’s kind of a sitcom dynamic where it’s a very conservative Midwest set of

it’s a very conservative Midwest set of

it’s a very conservative Midwest set of parents with a closet full of guns and

parents with a closet full of guns and

parents with a closet full of guns and then you’ve got the young free-spirited

then you’ve got the young free-spirited

then you’ve got the young free-spirited daughter the daughter and her husband

daughter the daughter and her husband

daughter the daughter and her husband just had a newborn baby and the daughter

just had a newborn baby and the daughter

just had a newborn baby and the daughter did something very dumb not having the

did something very dumb not having the

did something very dumb not having the baby that was fine but this is today she

baby that was fine but this is today she

baby that was fine but this is today she got a text message she got her text out

got a text message she got her text out

got a text message she got her text out and she sent a group message to her

and she sent a group message to her

and she sent a group message to her family and she said I want you all to

family and she said I want you all to

family and she said I want you all to know that we are not comfortable

know that we are not comfortable

know that we are not comfortable sleeping or staying in a house where

sleeping or staying in a house where

sleeping or staying in a house where there’s guns or driving in a car where

there’s guns or driving in a car where

there’s guns or driving in a car where there’s done it’s owned by gun owners

there’s done it’s owned by gun owners

there’s done it’s owned by gun owners and put aside gun control or Second

and put aside gun control or Second

and put aside gun control or Second Amendment rights however you want to

Amendment rights however you want to

Amendment rights however you want to frame that debate that’s tertiary to

frame that debate that’s tertiary to

frame that debate that’s tertiary to this

this

this it was stupid because it had a minimal

it was stupid because it had a minimal

it was stupid because it had a minimal impact on the national debate on the gun

impact on the national debate on the gun

impact on the national debate on the gun control debate but it had a maximum

control debate but it had a maximum

control debate but it had a maximum impact on her personal relationship and

impact on her personal relationship and

impact on her personal relationship and if you follow Ted over the past five six

if you follow Ted over the past five six

if you follow Ted over the past five six years you’ll know one of the predominant

years you’ll know one of the predominant

years you’ll know one of the predominant themes is these are the relationships

themes is these are the relationships

themes is these are the relationships that give us joy that are good for our

that give us joy that are good for our

that give us joy that are good for our health and make us live longer that make

health and make us live longer that make

health and make us live longer that make us happier and it’s not just her anyone

us happier and it’s not just her anyone

us happier and it’s not just her anyone who’s been on Facebook in the past three

who’s been on Facebook in the past three

who’s been on Facebook in the past three months we’ll have some variation of this

months we’ll have some variation of this

months we’ll have some variation of this story to tell we’re ripping each other

story to tell we’re ripping each other

story to tell we’re ripping each other apart and for what there’s no benefit to

apart and for what there’s no benefit to

apart and for what there’s no benefit to it this is one my favorite quotes from

it this is one my favorite quotes from

it this is one my favorite quotes from the 2016 cycle and you might say oh this

the 2016 cycle and you might say oh this

the 2016 cycle and you might say oh this is kind of this is Gandhi asked or this

is kind of this is Gandhi asked or this

is kind of this is Gandhi asked or this is Nelson Mandela this is a former

is Nelson Mandela this is a former

is Nelson Mandela this is a former secretary of the UN this was George W

secretary of the UN this was George W

secretary of the UN this was George W Bush and he’s exactly right the way that

Bush and he’s exactly right the way that

Bush and he’s exactly right the way that we interact with each other in the

we interact with each other in the

we interact with each other in the political sense has fundamentally

political sense has fundamentally

political sense has fundamentally altered and not really good and I don’t

altered and not really good and I don’t

altered and not really good and I don’t think we’re at the worst point in

think we’re at the worst point in

think we’re at the worst point in history civil war 1960s we’ve been here

history civil war 1960s we’ve been here

history civil war 1960s we’ve been here before but we need to do a few smart

before but we need to do a few smart

before but we need to do a few smart things to pull ourselves out of it to

things to pull ourselves out of it to

things to pull ourselves out of it to pull ourselves out of the the spin

pull ourselves out of the the spin

pull ourselves out of the the spin there’s three things that you can do to

there’s three things that you can do to

there’s three things that you can do to deflect what political guys like me use

deflect what political guys like me use

deflect what political guys like me use to encourage this type of

to encourage this type of

to encourage this type of and encourage its also that we can win

and encourage its also that we can win

and encourage its also that we can win of course but division is I think a

of course but division is I think a

of course but division is I think a byproduct of it it’s fundamentally as

byproduct of it it’s fundamentally as

byproduct of it it’s fundamentally as political guys we want you to be

political guys we want you to be

political guys we want you to be emotional we look for vice to exploit if

emotional we look for vice to exploit if

emotional we look for vice to exploit if we’re conservatives we want you angry

we’re conservatives we want you angry

we’re conservatives we want you angry and we’ll figure out ways to make you

and we’ll figure out ways to make you

and we’ll figure out ways to make you angry maybe it’s Colin Kaepernick’s

angry maybe it’s Colin Kaepernick’s

angry maybe it’s Colin Kaepernick’s kneeling for the national anthem and

kneeling for the national anthem and

kneeling for the national anthem and disrespecting that that symbol if you’re

disrespecting that that symbol if you’re

disrespecting that that symbol if you’re a Democrat you might be upset about

a Democrat you might be upset about

a Democrat you might be upset about injustice or the haves versus the

injustice or the haves versus the

injustice or the haves versus the have-nots and they will use that to get

have-nots and they will use that to get

have-nots and they will use that to get into your heart and once they are in

into your heart and once they are in

into your heart and once they are in your heart you will believe and you will

your heart you will believe and you will

your heart you will believe and you will do damn near anything bless me Father

do damn near anything bless me Father

do damn near anything bless me Father for I have sinned I am guilty of this as

for I have sinned I am guilty of this as

for I have sinned I am guilty of this as a political guy three things that you

a political guy three things that you

a political guy three things that you can do so I’m gonna start with what I

can do so I’m gonna start with what I

can do so I’m gonna start with what I call the golden rule it’s not very

call the golden rule it’s not very

call the golden rule it’s not very original but I’d to put some kind of

original but I’d to put some kind of

original but I’d to put some kind of name on it that’s why I came up with

name on it that’s why I came up with

name on it that’s why I came up with passion and knowledge in politics tend

passion and knowledge in politics tend

passion and knowledge in politics tend to be an inverse relationship the more

to be an inverse relationship the more

to be an inverse relationship the more you know about a subject and I don’t

you know about a subject and I don’t

you know about a subject and I don’t mean the more of a subject where you

mean the more of a subject where you

mean the more of a subject where you think you’re right or this is I know

think you’re right or this is I know

think you’re right or this is I know everything on why the Iraq war was wrong

everything on why the Iraq war was wrong

everything on why the Iraq war was wrong or why we should reform the tax code I

or why we should reform the tax code I

or why we should reform the tax code I mean you know both sides of the issue

mean you know both sides of the issue

mean you know both sides of the issue and you can articulate both sides of the

and you can articulate both sides of the

and you can articulate both sides of the issue that is true knowledge your

issue that is true knowledge your

issue that is true knowledge your passion goes down your heart hardens

passion goes down your heart hardens

passion goes down your heart hardens against the the political maneuverings

against the the political maneuverings

against the the political maneuverings and the political lions that try to get

and the political lions that try to get

and the political lions that try to get you upset and try to get you angry

passion and knowledge have an inverse

passion and knowledge have an inverse relationship the second thing is have

relationship the second thing is have

relationship the second thing is have more questions and answers have more

more questions and answers have more

more questions and answers have more questions and answers it is difficult

questions and answers it is difficult

questions and answers it is difficult for somebody to interact on a positive

for somebody to interact on a positive

for somebody to interact on a positive way whether it be a family member or a

way whether it be a family member or a

way whether it be a family member or a friend whatever if that person has all

friend whatever if that person has all

friend whatever if that person has all the answers we all know somebody who has

the answers we all know somebody who has

the answers we all know somebody who has all the answers

all the answers

all the answers oftentimes they have very few answers as

oftentimes they have very few answers as

oftentimes they have very few answers as a policy guy my expertise is in national

a policy guy my expertise is in national

a policy guy my expertise is in national security and Veterans Affairs but when I

security and Veterans Affairs but when I

security and Veterans Affairs but when I would advise Jeb or me

would advise Jeb or me

would advise Jeb or me on a policy issue the very first thing

on a policy issue the very first thing

on a policy issue the very first thing that I did was I found all the people

that I did was I found all the people

that I did was I found all the people who are knowledgeable on that particular

who are knowledgeable on that particular

who are knowledgeable on that particular subject and I asked questions Jeb was

subject and I asked questions Jeb was

subject and I asked questions Jeb was very strict about this he wanted to

very strict about this he wanted to

very strict about this he wanted to understand both sides so he could

understand both sides so he could

understand both sides so he could clearly articulate them when he was

clearly articulate them when he was

clearly articulate them when he was challenged on it and I learned that for

challenged on it and I learned that for

challenged on it and I learned that for a moment it’s a lesson I’ll never forget

a moment it’s a lesson I’ll never forget

a moment it’s a lesson I’ll never forget have more questions and you have answers

have more questions and you have answers

have more questions and you have answers and then the final thing is this

be intelligent about how you ingest

be intelligent about how you ingest media because it has changed look for

media because it has changed look for

media because it has changed look for things that make you informed if you’re

things that make you informed if you’re

things that make you informed if you’re reading an article and it’s trying to

reading an article and it’s trying to

reading an article and it’s trying to make you angry throw it out it’s all

make you angry throw it out it’s all

make you angry throw it out it’s all over the discourse now you’ll see you

over the discourse now you’ll see you

over the discourse now you’ll see you see it all the time go online you see

see it all the time go online you see

see it all the time go online you see emotional state followed by fact that is

emotional state followed by fact that is

emotional state followed by fact that is this article will make you shocked this

this article will make you shocked this

this article will make you shocked this will make you angry this will make you

will make you angry this will make you

will make you angry this will make you jealous this will make you greedy

jealous this will make you greedy

jealous this will make you greedy followed by xxx you all know clickbait

followed by xxx you all know clickbait

followed by xxx you all know clickbait but it’s growing as a tool that

but it’s growing as a tool that

but it’s growing as a tool that Americans use to get their news it’s not

Americans use to get their news it’s not

Americans use to get their news it’s not healthy for us it’s not healthy for the

healthy for us it’s not healthy for the

healthy for us it’s not healthy for the Republic it’s not healthy for us as a

Republic it’s not healthy for us as a

Republic it’s not healthy for us as a people use good sources New York Times

people use good sources New York Times

people use good sources New York Times Washington Post Wall Street Journal that

Washington Post Wall Street Journal that

Washington Post Wall Street Journal that sure they have their biases everyone

sure they have their biases everyone

sure they have their biases everyone does we all have some bias in our heart

does we all have some bias in our heart

does we all have some bias in our heart but they also have fact-checking

but they also have fact-checking

but they also have fact-checking they also have editorial oversight they

they also have editorial oversight they

they also have editorial oversight they also have a church and state separation

also have a church and state separation

also have a church and state separation between opinion in fact I’m gonna leave

between opinion in fact I’m gonna leave

between opinion in fact I’m gonna leave you with this I’m not saying that ideas

you with this I’m not saying that ideas

you with this I’m not saying that ideas are dangerous or political opinions are

are dangerous or political opinions are

are dangerous or political opinions are bad they’re a good thing they’re good

bad they’re a good thing they’re good

bad they’re a good thing they’re good for the Republic but ask yourself how

for the Republic but ask yourself how

for the Republic but ask yourself how are my ideas leading me to treat other

are my ideas leading me to treat other

are my ideas leading me to treat other people I found that guy after the event

people I found that guy after the event

people I found that guy after the event and I said I hear you on the anger thing

and I said I hear you on the anger thing

and I said I hear you on the anger thing I really do but you know I live in the

I really do but you know I live in the

I really do but you know I live in the United States of America in the 21st

United States of America in the 21st

United States of America in the 21st century

century

century I watched NASA put a probe on a comet

I watched NASA put a probe on a comet

I watched NASA put a probe on a comet something in what had killed me fifty

something in what had killed me fifty

something in what had killed me fifty years ago I can get knocked out and with

years ago I can get knocked out and with

years ago I can get knocked out and with a doctor’s visit in an afternoon I can

a doctor’s visit in an afternoon I can

a doctor’s visit in an afternoon I can pull out my smartphone and I can touch

pull out my smartphone and I can touch

pull out my smartphone and I can touch and talk to any one of my friends or

and talk to any one of my friends or

and talk to any one of my friends or anyone of my family from no matter where

anyone of my family from no matter where

anyone of my family from no matter where we’re separate no matter how far apart

we’re separate no matter how far apart

we’re separate no matter how far apart were separated crime is that some of

were separated crime is that some of

were separated crime is that some of those lowest levels in decades income is

those lowest levels in decades income is

those lowest levels in decades income is up education is up literacy is up

up education is up literacy is up

up education is up literacy is up I hear you on how angry you are but do

I hear you on how angry you are but do

I hear you on how angry you are but do you have any idea just how grateful I am

you have any idea just how grateful I am

you have any idea just how grateful I am thank you

thank you

thank you [Applause]

”

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *