we are a divided people who knows we’re divided politically into red states and
divided politically into red states and
divided politically into red states and blue states we’re divided on social
blue states we’re divided on social
blue states we’re divided on social media and to our own little echo
media and to our own little echo
media and to our own little echo chambers where we can belong the people
chambers where we can belong the people
chambers where we can belong the people we disagree and most of us recognize
we disagree and most of us recognize
we disagree and most of us recognize that this is a bad situation it’s bad
that this is a bad situation it’s bad
that this is a bad situation it’s bad because it’s unpleasant but it’s also
because it’s unpleasant but it’s also
because it’s unpleasant but it’s also bad because it makes it harder for us to
bad because it makes it harder for us to
bad because it makes it harder for us to solve the practical problems that face
solve the practical problems that face
solve the practical problems that face us problems about climate change or
us problems about climate change or
us problems about climate change or religious liberty or economic policy
religious liberty or economic policy
religious liberty or economic policy these all require some kind of solution
these all require some kind of solution
these all require some kind of solution from us and unless we can come together
from us and unless we can come together
from us and unless we can come together at the table to discuss them it’s harder
at the table to discuss them it’s harder
at the table to discuss them it’s harder to solve them I know something about
to solve them I know something about
to solve them I know something about this the last several decades I have
this the last several decades I have
this the last several decades I have traveled the country participating in
traveled the country participating in
traveled the country participating in the culture wars specifically on the
the culture wars specifically on the
the culture wars specifically on the issue of same-sex marriage when I
issue of same-sex marriage when I
issue of same-sex marriage when I started doing this in the early nineties
started doing this in the early nineties
started doing this in the early nineties most Americans were opposed to same-sex
most Americans were opposed to same-sex
most Americans were opposed to same-sex marriage in fact in 1996 the first year
marriage in fact in 1996 the first year
marriage in fact in 1996 the first year that Gallup started polling on the issue
that Gallup started polling on the issue
that Gallup started polling on the issue 68 percent of Americans said they were
68 percent of Americans said they were
68 percent of Americans said they were opposed only 27 percent in favor as
opposed only 27 percent in favor as
opposed only 27 percent in favor as opposed to today where we have 61
opposed to today where we have 61
opposed to today where we have 61 percent in favor and 37 percent against
percent in favor and 37 percent against
percent in favor and 37 percent against so there’s been a real change here and
so there’s been a real change here and
so there’s been a real change here and during my time engaged in those culture
during my time engaged in those culture
during my time engaged in those culture wars I built some interesting
wars I built some interesting
wars I built some interesting relationships even friendships with
relationships even friendships with
relationships even friendships with people on the other side of the issue
people on the other side of the issue
people on the other side of the issue people like Glenn snaffle to Focus on
people like Glenn snaffle to Focus on
people like Glenn snaffle to Focus on the Family
the Family
the Family Maggie Gallagher of the National
Maggie Gallagher of the National
Maggie Gallagher of the National Organization for Marriage and people
Organization for Marriage and people
Organization for Marriage and people would sometimes ask me John how can you
would sometimes ask me John how can you
would sometimes ask me John how can you as a gay rights advocate and a gay man
as a gay rights advocate and a gay man
as a gay rights advocate and a gay man in yourself be friends with people who
in yourself be friends with people who
in yourself be friends with people who are fighting against your rights and the
are fighting against your rights and the
are fighting against your rights and the answer to that question is very simple
answer to that question is very simple
answer to that question is very simple I drink know the answer to my question
I drink know the answer to my question
I drink know the answer to my question is that I recognize that we all have to
is that I recognize that we all have to
is that I recognize that we all have to share the world together and if we’re
share the world together and if we’re
share the world together and if we’re going to do that successfully it’s
going to do that successfully it’s
going to do that successfully it’s better for us to be able to come to the
better for us to be able to come to the
better for us to be able to come to the table and enter in a respectful dialogue
table and enter in a respectful dialogue
table and enter in a respectful dialogue but you know sometimes that’s not easy
but you know sometimes that’s not easy
but you know sometimes that’s not easy to do and one of the reasons it’s not
to do and one of the reasons it’s not
to do and one of the reasons it’s not easy to do
easy to do
easy to do this because what we say we want a
this because what we say we want a
this because what we say we want a better dialogue we often end up saying
better dialogue we often end up saying
better dialogue we often end up saying things that function as conversation
things that function as conversation
things that function as conversation stuff there’s their way of stopping the
stuff there’s their way of stopping the
stuff there’s their way of stopping the conversation and making that dialogue
conversation and making that dialogue
conversation and making that dialogue partner and today I want to talk about
partner and today I want to talk about
partner and today I want to talk about five of those some of them are coming on
five of those some of them are coming on
five of those some of them are coming on the right side of the culture wars some
the right side of the culture wars some
the right side of the culture wars some of the more common on the left side of
of the more common on the left side of
of the more common on the left side of the cultural wars all of them take our
the cultural wars all of them take our
the cultural wars all of them take our challenges more difficult to confront
challenges more difficult to confront
challenges more difficult to confront the first one comes from the right side
the first one comes from the right side
the first one comes from the right side is the Klamath I’m not interested in
is the Klamath I’m not interested in
is the Klamath I’m not interested in being more politically correct what does
being more politically correct what does
being more politically correct what does that charge mean when we say that
that charge mean when we say that
that charge mean when we say that something is being politically correct
something is being politically correct
something is being politically correct it suggests that there’s a kind of
it suggests that there’s a kind of
it suggests that there’s a kind of orthodoxy being imposed on the
orthodoxy being imposed on the
orthodoxy being imposed on the conversation stifling free speech saying
conversation stifling free speech saying
conversation stifling free speech saying there are certain things that you cannot
there are certain things that you cannot
there are certain things that you cannot say what things well usually people
say what things well usually people
say what things well usually people bring this up when they feel like
bring this up when they feel like
bring this up when they feel like they’re not allowed to say certain
they’re not allowed to say certain
they’re not allowed to say certain things that hurting people who are
things that hurting people who are
things that hurting people who are marginalizing people behaviors and
marginalizing people behaviors and
marginalizing people behaviors and actions that actually hurt others and
actions that actually hurt others and
actions that actually hurt others and when they’re talking about they’re
when they’re talking about they’re
when they’re talking about they’re saying well you’re just being all
saying well you’re just being all
saying well you’re just being all politically correct the irony is that
politically correct the irony is that
politically correct the irony is that this charge functions as a kind of
this charge functions as a kind of
this charge functions as a kind of political correctness itself it says
political correctness itself it says
political correctness itself it says there are certain things you can say you
there are certain things you can say you
there are certain things you can say you can’t tell me when my words and my
can’t tell me when my words and my
can’t tell me when my words and my actions hurt and marginalizing see
actions hurt and marginalizing see
actions hurt and marginalizing see that’s not how free speech works free
that’s not how free speech works free
that’s not how free speech works free speech means that I get to say what I
speech means that I get to say what I
speech means that I get to say what I believe and you get to tell me when I’m
believe and you get to tell me when I’m
believe and you get to tell me when I’m being a jerk it’s true now there may be
being a jerk it’s true now there may be
being a jerk it’s true now there may be threats to free speech that you want to
threats to free speech that you want to
threats to free speech that you want to speak up against and that’s great but
speak up against and that’s great but
speak up against and that’s great but when you do that don’t just label them
when you do that don’t just label them
when you do that don’t just label them as politically correct that’s a easy way
as politically correct that’s a easy way
as politically correct that’s a easy way out it’s lazy and also functions as a
out it’s lazy and also functions as a
out it’s lazy and also functions as a conversation stuff now
conversation stuff now
conversation stuff now while the right tends to use this charge
while the right tends to use this charge
while the right tends to use this charge of Louisville correctness the left
of Louisville correctness the left
of Louisville correctness the left sometimes uses the charge of imagery to
sometimes uses the charge of imagery to
sometimes uses the charge of imagery to stop the conversation what does this
stop the conversation what does this
stop the conversation what does this mean well the Webster’s tells us the
mean well the Webster’s tells us the
mean well the Webster’s tells us the bigot is a person who is obstinately or
bigot is a person who is obstinately or
bigot is a person who is obstinately or intolerant ly devoted to his or her own
intolerant ly devoted to his or her own
intolerant ly devoted to his or her own opinions
opinions
opinions how many of you have beliefs that you
how many of you have beliefs that you
how many of you have beliefs that you are stubbornly devoted to raise your
are stubbornly devoted to raise your
are stubbornly devoted to raise your hand
hand
hand Lisa R stubbornly most all of us do and
Lisa R stubbornly most all of us do and
Lisa R stubbornly most all of us do and my agreement comes under calm conditions
if I disagree with them in a certain way
if I disagree with them in a certain way I may call them bigotry in what way well
I may call them bigotry in what way well
I may call them bigotry in what way well what I call of yoohoo bigoted I’m not
what I call of yoohoo bigoted I’m not
what I call of yoohoo bigoted I’m not just saying that it’s wrong
just saying that it’s wrong
just saying that it’s wrong I’m saying that it doesn’t even belong
I’m saying that it doesn’t even belong
I’m saying that it doesn’t even belong at the table
at the table
at the table it doesn’t even belong as part of polite
it doesn’t even belong as part of polite
it doesn’t even belong as part of polite conversation it’s beyond the pale well
conversation it’s beyond the pale well
conversation it’s beyond the pale well that claim is a conversation stopper if
that claim is a conversation stopper if
that claim is a conversation stopper if anything is now granted sometimes this
anything is now granted sometimes this
anything is now granted sometimes this is the appropriate stance to take there
is the appropriate stance to take there
is the appropriate stance to take there are some views that are so bad that the
are some views that are so bad that the
are some views that are so bad that the only appropriate response is shunning
only appropriate response is shunning
only appropriate response is shunning not engaging but we obviously use that
not engaging but we obviously use that
not engaging but we obviously use that stance sparingly if we dial every
stance sparingly if we dial every
stance sparingly if we dial every conflict up to the outrage level that’s
conflict up to the outrage level that’s
conflict up to the outrage level that’s not just going to get us all worked up
not just going to get us all worked up
not just going to get us all worked up it’s also going to make it harder for us
it’s also going to make it harder for us
it’s also going to make it harder for us to have productive dialogue with the
to have productive dialogue with the
to have productive dialogue with the movable bill it’s a conversation stuff
movable bill it’s a conversation stuff
movable bill it’s a conversation stuff now back over on the right we sometimes
now back over on the right we sometimes
now back over on the right we sometimes hear people say well look these are not
hear people say well look these are not
hear people say well look these are not my claims they’re God’s claims that is
my claims they’re God’s claims that is
my claims they’re God’s claims that is people hide their fallible prejudices
people hide their fallible prejudices
people hide their fallible prejudices behind claims about an infallible God
behind claims about an infallible God
behind claims about an infallible God this also functions as a kind of
this also functions as a kind of
this also functions as a kind of conversation stuff I used to get this a
conversation stuff I used to get this a
conversation stuff I used to get this a lot of marriage debate sometimes I would
lot of marriage debate sometimes I would
lot of marriage debate sometimes I would be invited to debate local pastors I
be invited to debate local pastors I
be invited to debate local pastors I have nothing against pastors but it’s
have nothing against pastors but it’s
have nothing against pastors but it’s too easy for some of them the frame the
too easy for some of them the frame the
too easy for some of them the frame the things and frame things in the following
things and frame things in the following
things and frame things in the following way they say here’s what John Corbino
way they say here’s what John Corbino
way they say here’s what John Corbino says about homosexuality and here’s what
says about homosexuality and here’s what
says about homosexuality and here’s what God says about us as well how am I going
God says about us as well how am I going
God says about us as well how am I going to win
to win
to win think about this for just a second John
think about this for just a second John
think about this for just a second John Corbino has a PhD in philosophy God is
Corbino has a PhD in philosophy God is
Corbino has a PhD in philosophy God is omniscient I can’t write I cannot learn
omniscient I can’t write I cannot learn
omniscient I can’t write I cannot learn that and of course I have to explain to
that and of course I have to explain to
that and of course I have to explain to people not what John burrito says versus
people not what John burrito says versus
people not what John burrito says versus what God says it’s two human beings of
what God says it’s two human beings of
what God says it’s two human beings of the state on the stage each trying to
the state on the stage each trying to
the state on the stage each trying to get to the truth
get to the truth
get to the truth believing in them fallible God does not
believing in them fallible God does not
believing in them fallible God does not make us available and any honest look at
make us available and any honest look at
make us available and any honest look at mysteries all those we should be careful
mysteries all those we should be careful
mysteries all those we should be careful but you can become too confident that
but you can become too confident that
but you can become too confident that they speak directly for God that’s why
they speak directly for God that’s why
they speak directly for God that’s why I’m kind of opting out of responsibility
I’m kind of opting out of responsibility
I’m kind of opting out of responsibility for the conversation it’s a conversation
for the conversation it’s a conversation
for the conversation it’s a conversation stuff now what’s interesting is that on
stuff now what’s interesting is that on
stuff now what’s interesting is that on the Left people do almost the opposite
the Left people do almost the opposite
the Left people do almost the opposite instead of trying to make their planning
instead of trying to make their planning
instead of trying to make their planning infallible they want to avoid making
infallible they want to avoid making
infallible they want to avoid making plans about children all physically
plans about children all physically
plans about children all physically about the earth and I sometimes hear
about the earth and I sometimes hear
about the earth and I sometimes hear people say things like morality is a
people say things like morality is a
people say things like morality is a private matter you shouldn’t judge other
private matter you shouldn’t judge other
private matter you shouldn’t judge other people you shouldn’t judge other people
people you shouldn’t judge other people
people you shouldn’t judge other people what does that mean so a we should go
what does that mean so a we should go
what does that mean so a we should go around wagging my finger equals face as
around wagging my finger equals face as
around wagging my finger equals face as well of course nobody likes a
well of course nobody likes a
well of course nobody likes a know-it-all but does it mean we should
know-it-all but does it mean we should
know-it-all but does it mean we should never make judgments about what other
never make judgments about what other
never make judgments about what other people are doing this is that part of
people are doing this is that part of
people are doing this is that part of being a morally responsible adult in the
being a morally responsible adult in the
being a morally responsible adult in the world will give it other people’s
world will give it other people’s
world will give it other people’s successes and failures adjusting our own
successes and failures adjusting our own
successes and failures adjusting our own lives and response to that isn’t it part
lives and response to that isn’t it part
lives and response to that isn’t it part of our responsibility to figure out what
of our responsibility to figure out what
of our responsibility to figure out what kinds of things we want to encourage
kinds of things we want to encourage
kinds of things we want to encourage what kinds of things will be nearly tore
what kinds of things will be nearly tore
what kinds of things will be nearly tore it and what kinds of things we must
it and what kinds of things we must
it and what kinds of things we must absolutely forbid and I sometimes hear
absolutely forbid and I sometimes hear
absolutely forbid and I sometimes hear well-meaning fellow liberals and I think
well-meaning fellow liberals and I think
well-meaning fellow liberals and I think as well it comes from a place of
as well it comes from a place of
as well it comes from a place of humility twist themselves into pretzels
humility twist themselves into pretzels
humility twist themselves into pretzels trying to be non-judgmental I once had a
trying to be non-judgmental I once had a
trying to be non-judgmental I once had a student do this he kept talking about
student do this he kept talking about
student do this he kept talking about what’s true for you and true for me and
what’s true for you and true for me and
what’s true for you and true for me and that’s right for you what’s right for
that’s right for you what’s right for
that’s right for you what’s right for being so you can’t really get any more
being so you can’t really get any more
being so you can’t really get any more plans because it was right for me may
plans because it was right for me may
plans because it was right for me may not be right for you and you look at a
not be right for you and you look at a
not be right for you and you look at a paper on this and I gave it
paper on this and I gave it
paper on this and I gave it and he was kind of upset about this he
and he was kind of upset about this he
and he was kind of upset about this he came into my office he’s like I look
came into my office he’s like I look
came into my office he’s like I look really hard on this paper why did you
really hard on this paper why did you
really hard on this paper why did you give it a neck
give it a neck
give it a neck I said well migrated this paper the way
I said well migrated this paper the way
I said well migrated this paper the way I read all my fingers sat at the top of
I read all my fingers sat at the top of
I read all my fingers sat at the top of the staircase and I throw the papers
the staircase and I throw the papers
the staircase and I throw the papers down the stairs first few stairs get
down the stairs first few stairs get
down the stairs first few stairs get AIDS and these internal heavy papers
AIDS and these internal heavy papers
AIDS and these internal heavy papers down to the bottom of the stairs it gets
down to the bottom of the stairs it gets
down to the bottom of the stairs it gets that and he said but but that’s not
that and he said but but that’s not
that and he said but but that’s not right and I said that’s not right for
right and I said that’s not right for
right and I said that’s not right for you
okay I didn’t really do that but if I
okay I didn’t really do that but if I had tenure I would ever I have tenure
had tenure I would ever I have tenure
had tenure I would ever I have tenure now so watch out then what does this
now so watch out then what does this
now so watch out then what does this story teach us it teaches us probably
story teach us it teaches us probably
story teach us it teaches us probably about just a private matter it’s about
about just a private matter it’s about
about just a private matter it’s about how we treat one another so things like
how we treat one another so things like
how we treat one another so things like fairness things like justice and we make
fairness things like justice and we make
fairness things like justice and we make small claims were making claims about
small claims were making claims about
small claims were making claims about how things ought to be out there in the
how things ought to be out there in the
how things ought to be out there in the world and if you say oh you can’t make
world and if you say oh you can’t make
world and if you say oh you can’t make those plans you shouldn’t judge people
those plans you shouldn’t judge people
those plans you shouldn’t judge people it’s a private matter it stops the
it’s a private matter it stops the
it’s a private matter it stops the conversation now many of the
conversation now many of the
conversation now many of the conversation stopper as I looked at and
conversation stopper as I looked at and
conversation stopper as I looked at and then on one side or the other but
then on one side or the other but
then on one side or the other but there’s one conversation stopper that I
there’s one conversation stopper that I
there’s one conversation stopper that I think of as an all-purpose conversation
think of as an all-purpose conversation
think of as an all-purpose conversation stuff but people all over the political
stuff but people all over the political
stuff but people all over the political spectrum use it they say that’s just
spectrum use it they say that’s just
spectrum use it they say that’s just your opinion now my first inclination
your opinion now my first inclination
your opinion now my first inclination when I hear this as a philosophy
when I hear this as a philosophy
when I hear this as a philosophy professor is to want to give a very
professor is to want to give a very
professor is to want to give a very technical philosophical response to this
technical philosophical response to this
technical philosophical response to this land that’s just your opinion which is
land that’s just your opinion which is
land that’s just your opinion which is my opinion I’m the one talking does it
my opinion I’m the one talking does it
my opinion I’m the one talking does it think it would have be that doesn’t say
think it would have be that doesn’t say
think it would have be that doesn’t say anything about whether it’s a reasonable
anything about whether it’s a reasonable
anything about whether it’s a reasonable opinion or an unreasonable one whether
opinion or an unreasonable one whether
opinion or an unreasonable one whether it’s one that you want to adopt or one
it’s one that you want to adopt or one
it’s one that you want to adopt or one that you want to reject not opinions are
that you want to reject not opinions are
that you want to reject not opinions are created equal some of our thoughtful
created equal some of our thoughtful
created equal some of our thoughtful backed up by the different evidence some
backed up by the different evidence some
backed up by the different evidence some are unreasonable biased even silly and I
are unreasonable biased even silly and I
are unreasonable biased even silly and I think part of the problem that we face
think part of the problem that we face
think part of the problem that we face here is that there are a number of
here is that there are a number of
here is that there are a number of different distinctions in the
different distinctions in the
different distinctions in the neighborhood and people tend to jumble
neighborhood and people tend to jumble
neighborhood and people tend to jumble them together and then they get all
them together and then they get all
them together and then they get all confused and let’s just Europe in one of
confused and let’s just Europe in one of
confused and let’s just Europe in one of those distinctions it’s a very important
those distinctions it’s a very important
those distinctions it’s a very important distinction it’s the fact value
distinction it’s the fact value
distinction it’s the fact value distinction and what we’re talking about
distinction and what we’re talking about
distinction and what we’re talking about moral issues of course that distinction
moral issues of course that distinction
moral issues of course that distinction come up factual and
come up factual and
come up factual and plans without the way the world is value
plans without the way the world is value
plans without the way the world is value claims claims about the way the world
claims claims about the way the world
claims claims about the way the world all to me the therapists people are
all to me the therapists people are
all to me the therapists people are doing this fact value distinction it’s
doing this fact value distinction it’s
doing this fact value distinction it’s somehow it gets more into a opinion
somehow it gets more into a opinion
somehow it gets more into a opinion distinction which is a lot more money I
distinction which is a lot more money I
distinction which is a lot more money I think and then that can somehow demoted
think and then that can somehow demoted
think and then that can somehow demoted into a fact mirror in distinction it’s a
into a fact mirror in distinction it’s a
into a fact mirror in distinction it’s a mirror opinion it’s like a matter of
mirror opinion it’s like a matter of
mirror opinion it’s like a matter of taste and yet often the things we’re
taste and yet often the things we’re
taste and yet often the things we’re talking about the things that divide us
talking about the things that divide us
talking about the things that divide us are not your matters of taste there are
are not your matters of taste there are
are not your matters of taste there are urgent matters of how we are going to
urgent matters of how we are going to
urgent matters of how we are going to live together in the world here’s a
live together in the world here’s a
live together in the world here’s a useful analogy think about it this way
useful analogy think about it this way
useful analogy think about it this way some only you’d like to keep your
some only you’d like to keep your
some only you’d like to keep your thermostat at seventy five degrees and I
thermostat at seventy five degrees and I
thermostat at seventy five degrees and I like to keep my thermostat at sixty-five
like to keep my thermostat at sixty-five
like to keep my thermostat at sixty-five degrees
degrees
degrees okay that’s something we can agree to
okay that’s something we can agree to
okay that’s something we can agree to disagree about you’ve got your house
disagree about you’ve got your house
disagree about you’ve got your house I’ve got my house now suppose we live in
I’ve got my house now suppose we live in
I’ve got my house now suppose we live in the same house the moral issues that
the same house the moral issues that
the same house the moral issues that divide us these controversial things
divide us these controversial things
divide us these controversial things we’re talking about often involve our
we’re talking about often involve our
we’re talking about often involve our house the world we share together and
house the world we share together and
house the world we share together and when we try to respond the claims within
when we try to respond the claims within
when we try to respond the claims within that sphere by saying well that’s just
that sphere by saying well that’s just
that sphere by saying well that’s just your opinion it makes it much harder for
your opinion it makes it much harder for
your opinion it makes it much harder for us to figure out how to do that together
us to figure out how to do that together
us to figure out how to do that together it’s a conversation so now I want to
it’s a conversation so now I want to
it’s a conversation so now I want to conclude with one final point that is
conclude with one final point that is
conclude with one final point that is important something I learned in my
important something I learned in my
important something I learned in my peers spending time in the culture wars
peers spending time in the culture wars
peers spending time in the culture wars because I often be involved in
because I often be involved in
because I often be involved in situations with people to say yeah I
situations with people to say yeah I
situations with people to say yeah I believe in dialogue I think it’s
believe in dialogue I think it’s
believe in dialogue I think it’s important for us all to come together in
important for us all to come together in
important for us all to come together in fact they pat themselves on the back
fact they pat themselves on the back
fact they pat themselves on the back because they’re so proud of themselves
because they’re so proud of themselves
because they’re so proud of themselves how open-minded they were for sitting
how open-minded they were for sitting
how open-minded they were for sitting down with people on the other side and
down with people on the other side and
down with people on the other side and then when it came time for it actually
then when it came time for it actually
then when it came time for it actually engage into the conversation they would
engage into the conversation they would
engage into the conversation they would just repeat their talking points
just repeat their talking points
just repeat their talking points that’s not dialogue that’s not
that’s not dialogue that’s not
that’s not dialogue that’s not conversation where dialogue is
conversation where dialogue is
conversation where dialogue is challenging will dialogue involves
challenging will dialogue involves
challenging will dialogue involves listening to other people not just
listening to other people not just
listening to other people not just listening so you can figure out where
listening so you can figure out where
listening so you can figure out where the flaws are so you can pounce on them
the flaws are so you can pounce on them
the flaws are so you can pounce on them but listening soon can understand
but listening soon can understand
but listening soon can understand and we’re not well most of all requires
and we’re not well most of all requires
and we’re not well most of all requires us to exercise our moral imagination to
us to exercise our moral imagination to
us to exercise our moral imagination to put ourselves in other people’s shoes
put ourselves in other people’s shoes
put ourselves in other people’s shoes it’s important for us to do that it’s
it’s important for us to do that it’s
it’s important for us to do that it’s important for us to do that because it
important for us to do that because it
important for us to do that because it helps us confront the practical problems
helps us confront the practical problems
helps us confront the practical problems that face us as we try to change the
that face us as we try to change the
that face us as we try to change the world and it’s also important because
world and it’s also important because
world and it’s also important because when it comes to our fellow human beings
when it comes to our fellow human beings
when it comes to our fellow human beings and the world we share it’s the right
and the world we share it’s the right
and the world we share it’s the right thing to do please keep the conversation
thing to do please keep the conversation
thing to do please keep the conversation going
going
going I’m John Correa
I’m John Correa
I’m John Correa [Applause]
[Applause]
[Applause] [Music]
you
you [Music]
”
Be First to Comment