Press "Enter" to skip to content

Brainy Choices – Greedy or Fair? | Katarina Gospic | TEDxNorrköping


Translator: Adel Aljurayyan Checker: Riyad Almubarak

Well, the theme of the day is about “mental choices: are they loud or fair?”

Let’s find out.

So, we are the result of our choices.

Severe options lead to bad results.

And the fact that 1.3 billion people around the world live in poverty

Shows bad choices.

If we are to develop living conditions for all,

We should make mental decisions.

This leads us to our first question:

Are mental decisions considered as valid or fair?

The final warning game is the perfect demo model

To study justice and social punishment.

Thus, in this game, both players must agree

On how to divide the amount of money between them.

Thus, the player suggested the other

“You half the amount and I have half the other”

The respondent can accept or reject the offer.

If the player agrees to accept the offer, that means the divider will be absorbed.

However, if the respondent does not accept the offer,

Both will not get the money.

Thus, if one chooses to reject an offer,

This means that he pays a price to punish the presenter.

This is also a way to apply justice,

Bean “If you are bad with me, you will experience the same treatment.”

So, here on your left side,

You see a fair example of the presentation.

“I have one hundred Danish crowns,

I will give you fifty of them, and keep the other fifty “

Fair offers like this, are 100% accepted all the time.

If, on your right side,

You see an unfair example of the presentation.

In this case, the presenter says,

“I have a hundred Danish crowns, I will give you twenty, and I will keep the remaining eighty.”

Such unfair offers are rejected by 50% all the time.

As we have heard before, according to economic theory,

Someone must accept all cash offers,

Because we must increase profit.

I mean, in the end, some money better than none, right?

However, this is not the rational behavior we are witnessing

In our daily lives.

And why?

Because this is due to the fact that our mechanism is at home,

In our minds that prevent us from greed.

Well, let’s take a look at what’s happening to the mind

When people play the final warning game.

In this particular study,

My colleagues and I were the first to appear

That the tonsil of the throat, which you see here,

An important structure of emotional therapy,

Which were included in unfair nerve processing

And also in refusing an unfair offer.

That’s right, they’re interesting

Because the tonsil is prepared with an old mental structure

And part of our creeping mind.

This means that the mechanism of justice is applied

He was there for a long time.

Another part of our study is to see what will happen

If we suppress the activity of the brain tonsil.

Can we change people’s behavior by disrupting the brain’s tonsils?

So, to achieve that, we gave people an anti-anxiety drug,

Because it is known that this drug inhibits the activity of the brain.

What happened next?

When there is no longer any indication of the tonsil of the brain,

These people accepted these far more unfair proposals

For the group I just got the placebo.

That is to say, when we gave people that anti-anxiety drug,

We made them very greedy.

Interestingly, we have not changed their perception of inequity.

It remained as if it was possible to observe what is fair and what is unfair.

We changed their behavior only.

Another interesting thing is the brain

When we treat others fairly.

In one of their studies, Trickomi and the rest examined what was happening

When the rich and the poor convert money between them.

To know this, divide the people into two groups.

The group got $ 80

They are considered rich people.

The other group got $ 30

These are considered poor people in this study.

And then, the task was simply to transfer money between them.

What happened next?

As you can see here,

When a rich person gave money to a poor person,

The scheme was activated, a brain reward center.

They felt good when they gave the poor some money.

But when they got the money from a poor person,

They did not feel good.

There was no sign of reward center in the brain

When you ask them to get money from poor people.

If you look at what happened to the poor,

The reverse pattern was observed.

As you can see here,

When a poor person gets the money from a rich person,

Their scheme has been activated.

That was a sign of brain reward.

But when they had to give money to a rich person,

There was no sign of reward.

This is like Robin Hood in our minds, I learn.

We take from the rich and give the poor,

This is close to what our mind tells us,

Because this kind of planning activity shows us

When resources are distributed fairly,

The mind sends everyone a reward mark.

This is the way of reason to tell us that participation is good,

That we must distribute our resources equally.

Viva Hibeez, register your comments.

(Laughter)

What happens if we leave the picture a bit,

And what happens when we follow signs

Mind tonsillosis and planning?

The research showed

That when we distribute our resources equally,

It brings us great benefits,

Because living in a society distributes resources equally

And the fact that the contradiction between rich and poor is very small,

Leading us to a cultured, better and healthier population sector.

There are many benefits.

It is usual for people to tell you to follow your heart in everything you do,

But, when it comes back to justice, my message here is to follow the buzz of your brain!

thank you very much.

(clap)

”

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *